Fluent vs. Non-Fluent Aphasia

Listen for and document the longest running statement,note the use of content words, especially nouns. Document the presence of complete phrases within utterances that may not be meaningful overall as opposed to truncated utterances that sound like telegrams (telegraphic speech) and carry a great deal of information.

"He is flying a tike" as opposed to "kite fly"
"The boy is (neologism) the co" as opposed to "boy in boat...water"

Both types of verbal output can "sound" dysfluent, but only the second examples are considered "dysfluency" in Aphasia.

Non-fluency often carries a lot of meaning in grammatically incomplete utterances and so is called "telegraphic speech."
Fluency often is "empty speech" in grammatically correct utterances.

AOS or Phonemic Paraphasias; Anterior vs. Posterior Lesions?

To ponder:

Errors: v/b as in tavle for table
sh/ch as in share for chair or wash for watch
d/t as in dime for time
s/sh as in sip for ship
sh/j as in Shawn for John

vowels tending toward schwa

superior awareness of errors with multiple and sometimes successful attempts
to correct

errors consistent across tasks and within same task

Is this more consistent with apraxia of speech or phonemic paraphasia?